Castells, M. (1997)
The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, vol. 2,
The Power of Identity, Oxford, Blackwell.
Fiske, J. (1993)
Introduction to Communication Theory, London and New York, Routledge.
Fuller, S. (1997)
Science, Buckingham, Open University Press.
Gibbons, M. (1999) ‘Science's new social contract with society?,
Nature, vol 402 (Suppl), pp. C81?4. Available from http://www.nature.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1038/35011576
Holliman, R. (2004) ‘Media coverage of cloning: a study of media content, production and reception?,
Public Understanding of Science, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 107?30. Available from http://pus.sagepub.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/cgi/content/abstract/13/2/107
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000),
Science and Society (Third Report), London, HMSO. Available from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm
Irwin, A. and Michael, M. (2003)
Science, Social Theory and Public Knowledge, Buckingham, Open University Press.
Irwin, A. (1999) ‘Science and citizenship?, in Scanlon, E., Whitelegg, E. and Yates, S. (eds)
Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels, London, Routledge.
McQuail, D. (1997)
Audience Analysis, London, Sage.
Medawar, P. (1999) ‘Is the scientific paper a fraud??, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Miller, D. (1999) ‘Mediating science ? promotional strategies, media coverage, public belief, and decision making?, in Scanlon, E., Whitelegg, E. and Yates, S. (eds)
Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels, London, Routledge.
Miller, S. (2001) ‘Public understanding of science at the crossroads?,
Public Understanding of Science, vol. 10, pp. 115?20. Available from http://pus.sagepub.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/cgi/content/abstract/10/1/115.
Montgomery, S. (1999) ‘Scientific discourse and its history?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Nelkin, D. (1995)
Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (revised edition), New York, W.H. Freeman.
Rowland, F. (1999a) ‘Diffusion of information across the sciences?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Rowland, F. (1999b) ‘Scientists in communication?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts. London, Routledge.
Rowland, F. (1999c) ‘Methods and motives for publishing original work in science?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Rzepa, H. (1999) ‘The internet as a medium for science communication?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Silverstone, R. (1991) ‘Communicating science to the public?,
Science Technology and Human Values, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 106?10.
Thompson, J. (1999) ‘The media and modernity?, in Mackay, H. and O'Sullivan, T. (eds)
The Media Reader: Continuity and Transformation, London, Sage.
Wilkie, T. (1996) ‘Sources in science: who can we trust??, Lancet, vol. 347, pp. 1308?11. Available from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com.libezproxy.open.ac.uk/retrieve/pii/S0140673696909472
Wilsdon, J. and Willis, R. (2004)
See-through Science ?
Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream, London, Demos.
Wulf, W. (1999). ‘Science and the internet?, in Scanlon, E. Hill, R. and Junker, K. (eds)
Communicating Science: Professional Contexts, London, Routledge.
Except for third party materials and otherwise stated (see terms and conditions), this content is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Licence
